![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: FFT and inverse FFT delay time |
tuscland Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Hello, I have tried a test to see if a direct FFT -> iFFT (without processing) would cause any distortion in the signal. To do this, I took a sample and substracted the FFT->iFFT signal with the original signal delayed by the time in sample of the twice FFT size. I was expecting that the delay should be of twice the FFT size, could someone explain me this behaviour? Thank you very much!
IP: Logged |
SSC Administrator |
![]() ![]() ![]() The Kyma FFT and inverse FFT modules are always working on four different times: * storing the incoming samples into an input buffer Cascading the FFT and its inverse will require essentially 7 buffers (the output buffer of the forward FFT is essentially the same as the input buffer of the inverse FFT). IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() ![]() |
This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.