Kyma Forum
  Tips & Techniques
  spectrum analyser logic for accurate results

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   spectrum analyser logic for accurate results
rafe
Member
posted 05 February 2007 23:04         Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
hello

i am currious about why the spectrum analyser tool gives infinetly more accurate results if during the remove transient/ clicks/ inharmonic stage i leave the fader at its lowest possible setting, allowing all of the sound to pass through even though the sounds that i am processing are definetely pitched in nature. sitar samples - tuned percussion - tabla etc sorry i intended to post but i cannot upload until i get new compression software.


thanks rafe

IP: Logged

SSC
Administrator
posted 06 February 2007 09:52         Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Perhaps you would be better off saving the first spectral analysis rather than proceeding to the step of tracing the fundamental and doing the quasi harmonic analysis.

If you are setting the unvoiced fader to the lowest value, you are saying, effectively, that the entire file is "unvoiced" and that Kyma should not try to track the fundamental frequency. You could get the same results by saving the first spectral analysis and skipping the quasi-harmonic step.

IP: Logged

rafe
Member
posted 08 February 2007 14:47         Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by SSC:
If you are setting the unvoiced fader to the lowest value, you are saying, effectively, that the entire file is "unvoiced" and that Kyma should not try to track the fundamental frequency. You could get the same results by saving the first spectral analysis and skipping the quasi-harmonic step.

yes, thanks, but what i am trying to under is why if kyma ignores the changes in frequency the results are more accurate.


IP: Logged

SSC
Administrator
posted 09 February 2007 09:56         Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It's not that it is more accurate or less accurate but that the quasi harmonic analysis is a harder task than the straight spectral analysis. The regular spectral analysis is essentially a bank of filters centered at fixed frequencies. When you do a quasi harmonic analysis, Kyma is trying to identify harmonics, even when they change frequency drastically. For your percussive sounds, it is probably best to stick with the regular spectral analysis.

IP: Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply

Contact Us | Symbolic Sound Home

This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c