|
 Kyma Forum
 Kyma Support
 Start Phase of LFO
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Start Phase of LFO | |
|
sidechain Member |
posted 24 February 2003 14:47
 
I've been trying to make a sine wave LFO that lets me assign a fader to the start phase. I'm aware that in the oscillator prototype there is a reset parameter but that only resets the start phase to zero. What i'd like to do is have a toggle switch that starts the LFO and a fader that selects which part of the phase it will start from... how can i do this? Sorry for all the posts, but i basically just got my Kyma system! IP: Logged | |
|
pete Member |
posted 25 February 2003 16:47
IP: Logged | |
|
sidechain Member |
posted 26 February 2003 17:12
Thanks a lot Pete! That's a really clever formula you came up with... it's very much appreciated! IP: Logged | |
|
sidechain Member |
posted 13 March 2003 18:15
I've been trying to modify the start phase LFO so it uses a triangle wave instead of a sine wave... i've tried to use the same principles used with the sine wave but i can't get it to work. How would i go about choosing the start phase of a triangle LFO? Thanks IP: Logged | |
|
pete Member |
posted 15 March 2003 16:34
Yes ,The method I used for the sine wave is for sine waves only. Its one of the things that make sine waves so special. If you want to do it with other waveforms you can use a delay module (with zero feedback). If you put " 1 s " in the max time field, then the variable delay field value will represent seconds. You can then put " (1/!Freq)*!Phase " in the variable delay field. This is where !Freq is the same value as the frequency of the original waveform and !Phase would be 360 degs at value 1 (90 degs at value 0.25). In this case the lowest LFO freq would be one cycle per second. If you needed lower frequencys you would have to put more seconds in the max delay field and adjust the formular in the same proportion. Hope this helps IP: Logged | |
|
bruno Member |
posted 16 March 2003 12:15
bruno IP: Logged | |
|
pete Member |
posted 16 March 2003 13:52
Yours idea is far more efficiant than mine. So attached is your method with a variable phase control. Pete. IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
|
Contact Us | Symbolic Sound Home
This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c