![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: timeline automation to preset? |
Phi Curtis Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() I have an idea which is maybe a feature request, but maybe you can think of a way to do it right now. I have a timeline which I have automated. I would like to perform the timeline now without the automation (i.e. after reverting all of the automated hot parameters back to 'live'), but using presets that are made by stopping the automated version of the timeline at various points in the playback and taking a 'snapshot' of the automated values at that point. In this way, I could perform a version of the piece live, but still at various important points in the performance recall the settings that I liked in the automated version. Is there by any chance a way to do this now? thanks, IP: Logged |
MathisNitschke Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() yes, since one of the recent updates you can call up presets from markers. read or search through the "what's new" page of the Wiki. IP: Logged |
Phi Curtis Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() But isn't that a way of recalling pre-existing presets? I'm looking for a way of saving automated parameters into new presets, and then performing with all of the parameters set back again to 'live'. IP: Logged |
SSC Administrator |
![]() ![]() ![]() Just to confirm, you would like to make snapshots during the automated playback? (So you could return to those snapshots during live-control playback?) Thanks! IP: Logged |
Phi Curtis Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Yes, I would like to save snapshots during automated playback, or while the timeline is paused, which would include the parameters that are currently automated. That way I could them remove the automation and improvise with the timeline live, but still be able to return to my saved settings at specific points in the piece (maybe even by using the marker-recalls preset function). Alternatively,it just occurs to me th at it might be even better if you could set up a parameter to be automated for parts of the timeline, and then live for other parts. Just to have the best of both worlds. Thanks, IP: Logged |
pete Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Hi SSC/Phil Isn't it more that you want to make a global temporary disable of the automation. This way when you go into non disable mode, the controls that were in automation mode will resume there status and dynamically adjust the controls as before. This is unlike saving a snapshot of the current automated state and firing it at the right time, which would have no dynamic (changing over time) ability. As is normal, once a new feature is added everyone wants even more to be added. With that in mind could I make a suggestion and jump the gun, as follows. If we had a new set of place holders called "Passes". A Pass would store the status of every control i.e. If live, then a single current value of that control will be stored, but if not live it will hold a pointer to the current automation "take". This way you could save a Pass and then continue to generate more takes and more Passes if needed. Firing a Pass would set the takes (and/or automation status) for each control back to the way they were at the time the Pass was created. You would have the option to fire a Pass with or without the live values updated, but it will always set the automation status and selected take. If you tried to delete a take that was called up by a Pass it would warn you before the delete was done. If a Pass called up a deleted take, it would revert to live, unless you called up or made another take and over wrote that Pass. There would always be the default empty Pass (number 0) which would equated to all controls being live. The zero Pass would always fire without live values updated. This way you could fire the zero Pass when you wanted live control and a user Pass when you wanted to revert. You could even switch between two user Passes if you wanted to selected different live controls. In a time line all Passes form all sounds would appear in the list (assuming a sound was copied from one time line to another), so simply firing one Pass from each sound and creating a new Pass (or overwriting an old one) would then make a global Pass.
I think I've covered every eventuality there or may be not? I know this would be a big job, but it may kill many birds with one stone. I also guess that there are many other things that need to be done first, so you may want to add this to your wish list. Hope it makes sense Pete IP: Logged |
SSC Administrator |
![]() ![]() ![]() OK, I guess this would be a huge project then. Thanks! IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() ![]() |
This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.