![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Pitch Deviation | |
gustl Member |
![]() ![]() ![]()
Here's the first tutorial about the stuff I was talking about at KISS2014: http://www.kymaguy.com/voice-controlling-voice-part-i/ Actually this is an improved version which is analyzing the pitch deviation for the whole spectrum without using individual oscillators! Attached is the sound as well. Enjoy! IP: Logged | |
robot Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Awesome !! looking forward to the formant version!! Has anyone figured out a quick way to get these or other wire in-between working in stereo? [This message has been edited by robot (edited 10 October 2014).] IP: Logged | |
johannes Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() i didnt tried the patch yet, but from what i read it seems to offer great possibilities in kyma, gustl! btw. did you already looked into ircam trax? thanks for sharing. Ciao, johannes IP: Logged | |
gustl Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks, glad you like it ![]() @robot: the easiest way is simply making a copy of it. there's this suffix module to rename the copied parameters if you need to. hope it helps.. @johannes: trax sounds good but it's very limited compared to kyma. allthough I haven't worked out the nice controllability of the plugin, my Kyma patches sound better for the specified task. Edit: There is no suffix module, I was referring to the MonoToMultichannel suffix parameter.. [This message has been edited by gustl (edited 15 October 2014).] IP: Logged | |
gustl Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() @Andrew: Your mail doesn't work so I write my answer here: "Hi Andrew, Sorry, I was wrong about that module - what I meant was the MonoToMultichannel Best, IP: Logged | |
robot Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() @gusti Thanks for the reply my mail is down, should be back soon. Good idea on mono to multichannel i'll give that a whirl. A
Sorry, I was wrong about that module - what I meant was the MonoToMultichannel Best, IP: Logged | |
cristian_vogel Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Very Neat!! Thanks man, just the beginning... I don't seem to get the kind of results I might expect by putting the same processing on the Amps leg. Like I imagined some kind of inversed deviation amp spectrum.. I would expect holes where there are transients for example. But it doesn't seem to sound like that... will experiment more. [This message has been edited by cristian_vogel (edited 07 December 2014).] IP: Logged | |
cristian_vogel Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() ah got it now... I had made a mistake, forgot to scale the pure deviations before re-adding them. Interesting new dynamic effect. IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() ![]() |
This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.