Kyma Forum
  Confabulation
  this one´s for mathis

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   this one´s for mathis
Frank Kruse
Member
posted 01 June 2001 02:00         Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi mathis!
i just read what you did for that film in the "achter nerv" .
please tell us (me) more about how you integrated your system on the mixing stage. did you automate parameters to tc or did you do it on-the-fly? i do film work to, but i never used kyma "live" on the stage because i wasn´t sure wether it wastes too much time tweaking stuff , when the producer is crawling down your neck...
feel free to e-mail, if you want to talk off-forum.

frank@wildtrax.de www.wildtrax.de

IP: Logged

SSC
Administrator
posted 01 June 2001 09:43         Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just wanted to let you know that Mathis will be away from his office for two weeks, and may not reply right away...

IP: Logged

mathis
Member
posted 02 June 2001 23:38         Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
in times of internet ... where's the office?

yes, it was quite an exciting experiment, but it worked very well. i did no tc-synchronization, it wasn't necessary for this project. but i'm curious to find out how it works. i think about rotating atmospheres like i mentioned it in the soundfield discussion thread.

i prepared the effects and i had luck that they satisfied just like i made them. also it was wise to work with seperated outputs so the rerecording mixer had the possibilities to use whatever he needed. so i just built up my equipment and then they used it like an effects machine. i just sat there and had a smoke. very smooth indeed.

in this project i found out that you have to be very aware about rendering times for the filters. although kyma is a realtime system the filters need there time. i.e. the harmonic analysis needs a window to work. i had to put in a delay for every effect which is faster than the slowest one. overall rendering time was 90ms. so whenever we needed the effect, we just nudged the voice in protools two and a quarter frames earlier to fit synchronicity. but that's not a real problem. it's made in a second. you just have to be aware of it.
there are also two other things that have to be worked on, but i'll tell you when it's done.

say hello to fabian.
greetings from new york city,
mathis

IP: Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply

Contact Us | Symbolic Sound Home

This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c