![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Building a New Box |
R Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() After working with Kyma on a MAC for years...I made the move over to a PC...(Due to the insane cost of Mac's) I put Kyma on my old DAW (1 GB RAM (2X 512MB Kingston 333MHz DDR PC2700 DIMM CL2.5) ASUS 845PE DDR 333 WITH 1394 FIREWIRE 2.53 GHz P4 / G550 Grafix) and am happy minus a few grafix issues that seem to be solved after messing with the kyma grafix prefs...) I still get some slow screen re/draws and wierdness....but all in all..ok I want to move kyma over to a more compact system (a small shuttle box) Any reason I should re-look at getting a Mac? . . . (I use both platforms daily....but am getting sick of osx) the only other program i will be useing daily besides kyma is wavelab on this box) thanx. IP: Logged |
SSC Administrator |
![]() ![]() ![]() I've seen someone using Kyma X on a Sony VAIO pcg V505EX notebook 1.5G Centrino (Pentium M together with wifi capabilities). Graphics looked great, it was fast, and lightweight (about 2 kilos). IP: Logged |
R Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() quote: I'll check this box out.... IP: Logged |
Frank Kruse Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() you might want to consider that kyma-pc doesn´t handle SD2, AFAIK frank. IP: Logged |
dan.dan Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() I really like the Mac for this sort of thing. I use a PowerBook for Kyma--small, works great, doesn't need a UPS because it already has a battery. I guess I personally just think the Mac is a better platform for something like Kyma, but I know that's a matter of preference, and there is the undeniable cost factor. On the other hand, Mac hardware is exremely well made and reliable, and, in the end, it may be more cost efficient than risking losing customer data, etc. I'm really glad the Capy doesn't have a disk drive, because then it would need a UPS, and I would have to find some way to back up the data that was on the disk drive and so forth. The PowerBook handles all of that pretty elegantly--I can burn backups right onto CDs or DVDs. I also personally view the onboard converters as being hugely beneficial. It seems to me that, in terms of stand-alone converters, there are inexpensive ones that are cheaply made and unreliable, and then there are well made ones that are expensive. A significant part of the difference is simply the packaging--physical packaging, shielding, power supply, analog electronic parts. The Capy has a big head start on all of that, so on-board converters are a big win. Even though my studio is all digital, I just take the analog outputs from the Capy into my patchbay because it's much simpler and more flexible than trying to route digital signals around the studio, there are not synch problems, I can power it up and play with it without booting up my Pro Tools rig, etc. It sounds great. Anyway, about 80% of the bulk of the Capy is in the DSPs and memory--the motherboard bus with expansion cards, etc. Just my $.02 worth. Regards, IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() ![]() |
This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.