![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Mac vs. PC? |
KevinCole Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() At the risk of descending into flames, is there any collected wisdom on which system works best with Capybara / Paca / Kyma? Perhaps that question is too general: We're looking at a new machine purchase which will be used in scientific studies of hearing and speech. Obviously (?), our concerns revolve around quietness of the moving parts -- disk, fan, etc (solid state disks any good?), speed and consistency of speed for reaction time measurements among other things, and any special caveats that you may have encountered that we're not thinking of yet. One engineer has proposed custom-building the system, which sounds like fun, but I think I'm getting conservative in my dotage: Support from the campus IT department and/or a company with a warranty sounds like a good idea. That said, I'm willing to go the custom-build route if there's a lot of positive vibes for that solution from various sources. Thoughts? IP: Logged |
SSC Administrator |
![]() ![]() ![]() Are you thinking that you might find OSCulator useful for using controllers like the Space Navigator or the Wii Fit exercise board? Or are would a fader box be enough? IP: Logged |
KevinCole Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() quote: Huh? Did I miss something? Or is one of us posting to the wrong place? We're not using faders, Wii or other controllers. Are you suggesting perhaps we should? The way our experiments work now (typically): A subject is presented with two stimuli, and then asked to make a choice by clicking the mouse on a button on the screen. (We may eventually switch to something like relabeling keys on the keyboard and then having them use a key on the left side of the keyboard to mean "choice 1" and another on the right to mean "choice 2"...) Perhaps some other input device would be useful, but at the moment, we're not thinking that way... but I'm open to ideas. IP: Logged |
SSC Administrator |
![]() ![]() ![]() I was asking whether you thought you might avail yourselves of OSCulator's options since OSCulator is Macintosh-only (and that would argue in favor of Mac OS). As far as Kyma itself is concerned, there is no difference between Windows and Mac. IP: Logged |
KevinCole Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() quote: Ah, thanks. That makes it clearer. I'll look into it, but I doubt we'll go down that road. It wasn't meant to be so much a question about Kyma itself, but rather, in the collected wisdom of user experience, independent of Kyma, does one platform handle Capybara and Paca better? Faster, quieter hardware, or more reliable timing of events? The general sense I'm getting from your answer that such differences are minimal or nonexistent -- or highly unpredictable without a lot more specs. Do you know if anyone's spec'd out a "Dream machine" to connect to Capybara/Paca other than the minimum requirements? IP: Logged |
SSC Administrator |
![]() ![]() ![]() For low noise, have you considered placing the computer in a different room and using a USB extender for mouse & keyboard and VGA extender for the monitor)? Alternatively, the Mac Mini is pretty quiet. And you could install both Windows and Mac OS on it as a dual boot or Parallels (if you have >= 2 gigs of RAM). IP: Logged |
KevinCole Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() quote: Thanks. Your first solution is basically what we have used in the past, and may use again, although there seems to be some debate there. The second sounds ideal. (I shoulda thought about the multi-boot solution... Duh, me.) IP: Logged |
bluefire Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() FWIW the latest version of VMFusion has become a lot more seriously competitive with Parallels. IP: Logged |
tuscland Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() Hey Bluefire, Are you sure you can run Kyma on a virtual machine?
IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() ![]() |
This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.