![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: processor usage question in feedback networks |
keph Member |
![]() ![]() ![]() is it correct for a feedback network only to live on one processor? for example: a signal path that starts with an input, runs through processing and then is written into memorywriter and which is added back into the input. given that you can't break the entire process into branches that very well may be how it is, but i thought i'd check in and make sure that is correct. my work around has to be been use IO routing, but that introduces latency which may or may not matter. on the plus side is routing via IO encourages me to incorporate more external processsing which is often a good thing. IP: Logged |
SSC Administrator |
![]() ![]() ![]() You could try using this scheme to do cross-processor feedback loops: <FeedbackLoopOutput + source> --> [some processining] --->FeedbackLoopInput IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() ![]() |
This forum is provided solely for the support and edification of the customers of Symbolic Sound Corporation.